User Evaluation by Remote Pilots of Two Types of Detect-and-Avoid Systems: Remain Well Clear Bands Versus Route Guidance

Abstract

The remain well clear (RWC) function of a detect-and-avoid (DAA) system provides guidance to a remote pilot (RP) of a remotely piloted aircraft to prevent a conflict from developing into a collision hazard. The ACAS Xu standard is a decision support system that uses RWC bands to advise a RP which headings to avoid. A recent A* DAA system is a resolution support system that advises a RP which route to take. The objective of this study is to achieve structured feedback by professional RPs on the horizontal RWC guidance of both systems. Nine RPs participated in on-line experiments, where they were shown videos of DAA displays of encounter scenarios between two aircraft. At various stages the RPs were asked for their opinion about transparency, pilot manoeuvring, situation awareness, display orientation, risk perception, competence, trust, and overall system preference. The results show that the scores for competence, trust and pilot manoeuvring were significantly higher, and the score for perceived risk was significant lower for the RWCroute guidance. Overall, 89% of the RPs preferred the RWC route guidance, while one RP had no preference. An implication of the uncertainty in pilot behaviour is that ACASXumodel-based optimisation may provide suboptimal RWC guidance strategies, while the A* DAA optimisation can be managed effectively.